Concept Testing Questions: Templates, Pricing and Open-End Analysis

In this piece
Concept testing questions decide whether the results can explain a go/no-go call. Most question banks for a concept test stop at appeal and purchase intent. Those measures tell you whether respondents like the idea but rarely why or what would have to change before they buy. The sections below cover specific question phrasing, pricing questions and how to handle the open-ended responses those questions generate.
Key Takeaways
- Asking what specifically appeals tells you more than the appeal rating itself.
- Open-ended follow-ups and AI probing draw out the reasons that closed scales miss.
- Pricing discovery needs more than Van Westendorp: a threshold question and Gabor-Granger sharpen willingness to pay.
- Ask for an open reaction before any scale so the scale doesn't set the frame.
Concept Testing Questions That Go Beyond Appeal
Start with an open reaction before any scale: "What's your first reaction to this?" Respondents answer in their own words before a rating suggests what the study wants to hear.
Appeal is the floor. The useful work starts with the question directly after it: "What specifically appeals to you about this concept?" That follow-up separates a reflexive "sounds nice" from a genuine unmet need. Add a companion question: "What, if anything, concerns you or feels missing?" and you have both sides of the evaluation in the respondent's own words.
Differentiation needs its own question. "What does this offer that existing options don't?" is often more diagnostic than a comparative scale because it forces the respondent to articulate the gap. When respondents struggle to answer or repeat the concept language back verbatim, that is data: the differentiation is not legible to the category buyer. In product concept testing this single question can expose positioning problems that a battery of ratings would have hidden.
Purchase intent framing matters more than most briefs acknowledge. Conditional phrasing narrows the context and tends to produce a more realistic response. Try "If this were available at your usual retailer at a price consistent with similar products, how likely would you be to buy it?" That conditionality also sets up the pricing questions that follow.
Some concepts need more than one exposure before a reaction means much. Sequential monadic product tests run as diaries let respondents react across several days.
Pricing Questions Past Van Westendorp
Van Westendorp's Price Sensitivity Meter finds the range where resistance starts to build. A threshold question finds the wall: "At what price would you switch to a competitor you already trust?" It produces a single number and shows where the respondent would switch to a trusted alternative.
Gabor-Granger is worth adding once the concept has cleared the appeal hurdle. Present the concept fully first so respondents anchor on its value before they react to cost. Then show price points in a set or randomized order. Stepping strictly from high to low anchors respondents on the top price and tends to inflate willingness to pay.
Handling Open-Ended Concept Test Responses
Unprobed open-ends accept whatever the respondent gives. A vague answer like "seems interesting" sits in the data permanently, with no follow-up and no way to know what "interesting" meant. In an AI-moderated concept test, Enumerate's AI Probing reads each open-end while the respondent is still present. It asks a follow-up only when the answer misses the researcher's criteria, up to a maximum the researcher sets. The result is fewer vague answers sitting in the data. Teams that want reactions on camera can also run the concept as an unmoderated video concept test.
The analysis step still belongs to the researcher. A first coding pass gives the team a draft frame of themes and sentiment. Every generated theme sits in review before it applies. The researcher renames it, merges it with an adjacent theme or removes it if it's noise.
See how Enumerate probes concept test open-ends and gives your team a first coding frame to review. Book a demo with Enumerate.
Frequently Asked Questions
Concept testing questions work from a description, visual or prototype where the respondent has no direct experience with the product. Product testing questions assess actual use after the respondent has handled or consumed something. Running concept questions on a finished product anchors feedback on the physical object, which hides the need it was meant to address.
Sequence from open-ended reaction to structured rating. Present the concept before any scale. An open-ended "what's your first reaction?" lets respondents use their own words before a closed format anchors the frame. Avoid embedding the benefit in the question itself, which presupposes what the respondent cares about.
In exploratory rounds, treat purchase intent as diagnostic. Ask "How likely would you be to try this if it were available at a price you considered fair?" That wording captures conditional intent without fixing a price point. In later evaluative rounds, tie the intent question to a stated price and a comparison context. That shift from hypothetical availability to a named price and competitive reference is what makes the number useful for a go/no-go decision.
Related reading

Focus Group Research: How to Design, Moderate and Analyze It
A practitioner's guide to focus group research: discussion guide design, moderator technique, analysis and when to choose a different method.
Read more
Qualitative Research Examples: Four Studies That Show The Work
Four qualitative research examples covering diary studies, IDIs, AI-moderated interviews and video diaries, with the reasoning behind each method choice.
Read more
The New Shopper Geography: Quick Commerce, Live Commerce, Social Commerce
Quick commerce, live commerce, and social commerce are rewriting shopper behavior. Here's what the new shopper geography means for research teams trying to keep up.
Read more